|
The
Towering Wall Confronting Youth
|
Roya
Karimi Majd
Negar is a
fourteen-year old high school student with a good gpa. She’s
been using computers since grade school and her fluent English
betrays years of private lessons. Of the three boyfriends she’s
had so
far, two she met at parties, and one through the Internet, but
only her last boyfriend, Amir Ali was allowed to kiss her. Her
contact with the others was limited to conversation and dancing
at parties. Although she sometimes smokes, she refuses drugs like
marijuana, acid, and ecstasy. Her favorite drink is gin mixed
with tomato juice.
Negar sees
herself as an ordinary girl, but slightly doomed. She thinks
she’s doomed because her mother will kill her if she finds out
about her extracurricular activities. She’s recently been
feeling especially bad because her father refused to buy her a
pair of $250 Timberlands. For Negar, going to college is not a
future goal. She imagines she will either move abroad or marry a
rich man. She’s convinced that she’s pretty enough to bring
any man to his knees.
Negar’s
mother, Arezou, is 48 and has a bachelor’s degree in mechanical
engineering. Her oldest daughter was born immediately after
graduation, and has worked only part-time since. She says that
raising her three daughters has been more important than
attaining financial independence.
 |
Arezou
enjoyed a fabulous and exciting youth. Her freedom unrestricted
by her family, her weekends were spent entirely with friends. She
believes her clean and wholesome youth cannot be compared with
the conditions under which young people live today. She married
her first and only boyfriend whom she met at a party they both
attended with their families. Arezou was 21 and Ahmad was 27.
During their two-year courtship, their physical contact was
limited to the occasional handholding. Arezou has never smoked
and upon Ahmad’s insistence has only tasted alcohol once, a
glass of champagne.
For such a
mother, a daughter like Negar is a nightmare.
|
Arezou
explains, “Negar doesn’t come out of her room on the weekends.
It is only when the taxi appears out front that I discover that
she’s made plans for the evening. She comes out of her room
already wearing her manteau and headscarf. When I look at her
heavily made up face, I realize her behavior isn’t right for a
girl her age. She never says whose house she’s going to and
what time she will return. Once when Negar returned near dawn,
Ahmad was so angry he slapped her in the face. I wasn’t able to
calm him down that time. But by the next weekend, Negar was doing
the same old things. Her behavior hadn’t changed at all. I just
don’t know what to do with her anymore.”
----------------------------
In Iran,
there is much debate about youth and the generation gap. State
television and radio feature psychologists who admonish children
to speak respectfully to their elders, and advise parents to be
friends to their children and not automatically assume the worst
of their daughters. Intergenerational misunderstandings, mistrust,
poor communication, and frustration are common themes. They speak
to the nagging fear that the younger generation’s priorities
and tastes have become so different that they are completely
estranged from their parents.
While some
believe that the gap does not exceed the normal fissures that
arise between generations, there is a less sanguine perspective
that sees today’s youth as beguiled by outside influences,
namely Western culture. For the former, change and fluctuation
are natural and organic, and cultural influences are to be
expected. For the latter, expanded media communication is
effecting a cultural metamorphosis that is increasingly steering
youth further away from their roots.
While it may
seem that current conditions signal a break from Iran’s past,
in many ways, the youth are continuing a legacy that began a
generation before. The intense political and religious climates
of the 1979 Revolution split families both horizontally and
vertically in a manner that was unprecedented in Iranian society.
Marjan’s
case is one such example, “I was 18 years old and from an
affluent family. My father was a doctor and my mother a nurse. I
was opposed to my parents’ opulent lifestyle. My mother wore
light makeup but I wore a headscarf and objected to wearing
makeup. I threw away all my music tapes. I read religious
writings and prayed at the mosque. My brother wouldn’t go in
public with me because he was embarrassed by my appearance.”
Marjan’s
objections were many, “After February of 1979, I refused to eat
with the family. I believed that meat was the food of the
self-indulgent rich and as my family ate their meals, I would sit
in a corner eating bread with cheese or yogurt. My last act of
defiance was marriage to a pasdar (Revolutionary Guard).”
|
Marjan
may be an exception in that she never returned to her family
fold, but there were many households torn apart by
conflicting ideologies and beliefs. Before Iranian society
could recover from the flush of revolution, the war against
Iraq began, and again, generations responded differently. In
the early zeal, some of the young joined the war without
telling their parents and those not of age either tried to
secure their parents’ permission or forged their
permission slips.
Although
the horrors of war would soon quell the waves of volunteers,
it was perhaps during those years that maverick behavior
first took hold among the young. In the next generation, it
has appeared less in any political or religious commitment
as it has in an extreme form of individualism that some fear
is veering out of control. The dominant idiom among youth
speaks not of collective duty and struggle, but of
individual rights and individual struggle. Once the
collective memory of Imam Hossein going into battle against
all odds to fight injustice spurred on the young. Or of his
sister, Zeinab, who survived to tell the battle of Karbala
and raise the surviving orphans.
|

|
Fourteen
years after the end of the eight-year war against Iraq, daughters
of the martyred generation effect change by flooding universities,
questioning Islamic teachings, and walking out in brightly
colored headscarves and pink manteaus. And if some of their
fathers are uncomfortable, passivity has become more difficult to
enforce on girls who either directly refuse the role of dutiful
daughter or indirectly undermine it once out of their fathers’
watchful sight.
In Marjan’s
case, her difficulties with her 16-year old son, Amir are of a
different sort. A pious Muslim, Amir attends Friday prayers and
recites the Komayl prayer every Thursday. Marjan believes
that he should be doing sports, reading books, and spending time
with his friends. She sees her youthful self in him, a youth she
now regrets and cannot undo. She thinks it’s too late for her,
but she hasn’t given up on her son. Twenty-three years later,
she understands and sympathizes with her mother’s frustrations.
Exasperated with his behavior, Marjan says, “Amir is more
hardheaded than I was in 1979. He has nothing in common with kids
his age.”
Dr. Shahla
Ezazi, professor of sociology at the Allameh Tabatabai University
in Tehran argues that in the past, when parents and children
expressed similar goals and aspirations, youthful inquiry and
innovation was stifled as children operated within a conformist
mold. Not only youth, but also society’s progress as a whole
suffered under this “unnatural” state. She views the current
generation gap as progress, “If we are currently witnessing
divisions, it is because some of our young have stepped out from
under the shadow of their parents. They are undergoing a process
of differentiation and coming into their own. Their wants are
surpassing the scope of their parents’ understanding and
thinking.”
One such
place is the world of media. Once upon a time, only the wealthy
or educated had access to Western culture and as they traveled
back and forth, they introduced some of its elements to Iran.
Today, travel is less necessary when 250 dollars can provide a
satellite hookup and access to over 150 foreign channels. Even in
households that cannot afford a satellite dish or computer or
that frown upon such pastimes, internet cafés have made media
communications publicly accessible to youth.
In Persian
language chat rooms, second and third generation Iranians, both
within and without Iran, use Latin alphabet to communicate with
one another. These chat rooms are one of the few places
inaccessible to parents too confused to decipher the swift
punches of Latin keys. The invasion of information technology and
the satellite dish, combined with President Khatami’s 1997
election have increased young people’s cravings for different
possibilities.
|

|
About
these newer changes, Dr. Ezazi elaborates, “With the
lessening of restrictions after the 1997 elections, young
people discovered a new lifestyle that many parents didn’t
object to much on principle. Although this new lifestyle is
still quite restricted, young kids are making some decisions
for themselves. What’s important is that these freedoms
presently exist and they are the result of the efforts of
several generations.”
Another
factor that has been important in forming the younger
generation’s perspective and in defining the parent-child
relationship are the pressures that the regime has exerted
on its young. According to Dr. Ezazi, when even the
slightest infraction, such as walking on the street with a
boy can be punished with disproportionate severity, it is
only natural for parents to defend and support their child.
An adolescent who commits a crime by acting her age must
withstand harsh treatment, wait hours for a hearing, face a
judge much older than herself, and submit to a ruling she
deems unjust. The outcome is that teenagers and young people
spend less time in public places like parks as they do in
the relatively unfettered environment of each other’s
homes. |
However, not
all families are so supportive. In more conservative families,
the state’s criminalization of youthful behavior has had
especially violent repercussions for girls. A girl who
circumvents parental restrictions outside her home, only to get
caught by the police will face serious consequences for her
disobedience, but also more gravely, for publicly shaming herself
and her family by her arrest. A majority of runaway girls cite
paternal abuse as the major reason for running away, and for many,
the abuse escalated to intolerable degrees after they were picked
up by the police and their fathers were informed. For many such
girls, the physical abuse and restrictions of their movement
become so unbearable that they run away.
After leaving
behind the Revolutionary and War years, generations are trying to
come to terms with major social and cultural changes, to say
nothing of the far-reaching consequences of Iran’s economic
conditions on its youth. Information technology and the media
will only spread, but less predictable is the State’s future
impact on the reconfiguration of social relations.
To contact
the author: k_roya@yahoo.com
transl.: MS
Back
to top
|