|
Interview
with Maryam Salour
Conducted and translated by MS
Maryam Salour is a sculptress, ceramist, and teacher. She has
had numerous group and individual exhibitions at the Golestan
Art Gallery and the Modern Art Museum of Tehran in Iran, as well
as others in Europe. She is currently preparing for an
exhibition of her works at Illinois State University in Normal,
Illinois.
Salour - I was 18 years old when I went to France to
study computer science, and stayed for 14 years. I had friends
who were painters and for a short period of time, I painted
after completing college. We would draw and sell our paintings
in the streets.
It was very strange for me. I was from an upper-bourgeois
Iranian family and such activities were very taboo in our
culture. I was very concerned that my relatives who lived in
Paris would see me selling paintings on the streets. I had it
planned with my friends that if my family ever saw me, I would
tell them that I came to visit my artist friends.
The whole experience was pretty significant because a lot of
taboos were broken for me. I learned to trust myself more. I
removed myself from my social class, and all its inhibitions and
expectations, and spent some time being unemployed in Paris. I
came to Iran for 3 months, but felt that there was nothing for
me in Iran at that time.
I didn't know what I wanted to do with my life, and after
returning to Paris, I found the Sovigny Ceramic School. The name
of the street, Astrolabe, caught my eye, that's the only reason
I went down the street.
When I went in the studio, it was completely empty. Everyone had
gone out for coffee, and I was surrounded by pieces of pottery
and ceramics. They really caught me. There were all these jugs
and pitchers that reminded me of Iran. The ceramics of Hamedan
which were so common and part of my daily life... something old
from my childhood was touched. It was completely silent, and I
just stood there alone with all the pieces that were arranged on
various racks and shelves-it was like magic.
MS
- I think many people feel that with the right kind of
encouragement, they could have been successful, even great, in a
field they loved, but that was not accepted by their
surroundings.
Salour - Absolutely, and now that I'm a teacher, I'm very
sensitive to this. I always did well in the classes in which I
liked my teachers. And I did poorly in the classes in which I
didn't like my teachers. I believe that we all have a certain
amount of potential and talent, and it's just a matter of
getting the right kind of teaching and encouragement. It's
important how much a teacher gives a student attention and how
much that student is encouraged. I have taken the least talented
students and made them into really good sculptors. It's a
combination of spending extra time and providing care and
encouragement.
MS
- Did you see the film, "Homework", by Kiorastami?
When he asks the school children if they know the words,
encouragement and punishment, many of the children did not know
what encouragement meant, but they all knew what punishment
meant. It was very telling.
Salour - This movie was very big, and it had a big impact
on Iranian society here. The educational institutions took
notice. Kiorastami was zooming in on something that exists in
society, and that's what a great artist does. He observes and
exposes realities that others are not able or willing to see.
Many people criticized the movie, and said that he was abusing
these children in the film. I didn't see it that way at all.
There is a system of abuse that exists in our educational
system, and it's been going on for years; he merely brought it
to the surface and showed it for all to see.
In Iranian culture, we think that we are sentenced and doomed
from the start. We assume from the start that we're in the wrong,
unless by happenstance, we manage to do something right.
MS
- I think that this valorization of authority and hierarchy
based on age is a real problem in Iran. I met a female writer
who writes about women's issues, and she was speaking of her
tribal background. She was talking about her tribe, and her
father and her grandfather, and it really struck me how romantic
and unquestioning she was. Here's a woman who's committed to the
expansion of women's rights, and who questions male authority in
the larger society, but is unable to critically examine the
tribal family system-a markedly male-dominated and hierarchical
system-because that touches upon her own personal life. And I
think if you can't question your own family and the authority
figures that thrive there, then how do you expect to transform
society?
Salour - One thing to remember, women have a great deal
of power in the home. We, women have to know ourselves, and
recognize what's good for us, our children, and our husbands.
Our characters and our integrity would be much more in tact if
we did that.
Women who suffered from the poor treatment of their
mother-in-laws do the exact same thing to their daughter-in-laws.
That woman doesn't analyze the situation to prevent herself from
repeating the same mistake. Women who suffered a lifetime from
the inabilities and incapabilities of their husbands, raise
their sons in the exact same way. Their sons don't do any work
in the home-they don't clean or help with the housework. He's
the agha, while his sisters do all the work.
You see it everywhere in Iran. When you go the villages, you see
how much one woman does. She milks the cow, she does the farming,
she tends to the animals if they get sick, she gives birth, she
raises the kids, she cooks, she cleans. Yes, she gets help, but
from other women. She ages quicker, is beaten by life sooner,
and to top it off, her husband gets other wives.
And in this prison that she's suffering in, she puts her
daughters in cahoots with her, and her husband and sons in
cahoots with each other. I reserve my greatest criticism for the
women.
I never had a great relationship with children before I had my
own. I liked them well enough, but I didn't know them. After I
became a mother, my relationship and my perspective completely
changed. I love all children, and I see them all as my own.
It was in my nature, and I believe that it is in all women's
natures; I don't think that we need to repeat the same mistakes.
There is so much male domination in society. When I'm out in
public, I always let the men go by first or go through a door
first. I'll step aside to let him go even though it's in total
opposition to how I was raised. But I do it, because if I don't,
I know that he'll get in my space, and he'll make a point of
making me uncomfortable, either by actually physically touching
me, or by somehow getting in my way. When I go to an office, I
make a point of saying hello first and respecting this man,
because I know if I don't, he will potentially make things more
difficult for me.
This lack of respect to women is a very important issue and it
precedes the revolution. However, before the revolution, I knew
that if someone said something obnoxious to me on the streets,
somebody else would object and defend me. Even more important, I
knew that I could use my own voice and defend myself. But nobody
says anything anymore- they don't have the nerve to, and I don't
either because I'm not wearing a black chador.
MS
- It's interesting to watch pre-revolutionary movies. There
is so much misogyny, it's startling.
Salour - The objectification of women was much more
prevalent back then. It still exists-this whole veiling thing is
a continuation of the perspective that women are objects. But it
was dirtier and more vulgar back then, and to make things worse,
we were told we were free. But in reality, save for our voting
rights, which were constantly held up as proof of the regime's
respect, there wasn't a whole lot going on.
When you look around today, women are so much brighter and so
much more knowledgeable. Women's accomplishments and activities
were much less common before the revolution.
I see a good future for women in Iran because of the revolution.
If the only problem is wearing a headscarf, fine. I'll wear it,
and then I'm going to go out and do what I want, and demonstrate
and support who I want. Women are finding and making a place for
themselves.
The difference is between making change because you want to,
versus change being ordered from above. Women have to know what
changes they want for themselves, and how to live their lives.
It should not come as an order, a prescription from some higher
authority. I was at an art gallery once and I was speaking to
these Reza Shah supporters, and they said to me, very
insultingly, "The fact that you are standing here, carrying
discussions, are a college graduate, is because of Reza Shah. He
built those universities." I agreed with them, and pointed
to my hejab, and replied that the fact that I was standing with
this cover on, is also because of Reza Shah. If he hadn't forced
the unveiling of women, and hadn't stripped them naked so to
speak, then decades later, this different kind of imposition
wouldn't have been forced on me. I blame Reza Shah and that
system.
MS
- When I first arrived here, I was really surprised by this
romanticization of the past-something that apparently has been
growing stronger over the past few years. It amazed me how some
people conveniently forget or selectively remember the past.
Salour - But there are many young women who have figured
out where the problem lies, where the roots are. There are many
women-I'm including very religious women as well-who say that
they don't want their daughters to have the same lives as they
had.
I'll tell you, if the revolution hadn't occurred, there's no way
I would have returned to Iran. Under the Pahlavi regime, there
was so much contradiction-it was bourgeois, or at least
pretended to be. Society had become very ugly, and everything
was so distorted, I hated it all.
I loved Iran and I still do, it's my home. When I would visit
Iran, I encountered a vulgar society that placed value on the
worst elements from Western cultures. Nobody knew anything about
the positive elements They only knew about the garbage; the
lowest of the low had been imported from the West, but nothing
of the good.
MS
- How do you feel about addressing women's issues separately?
Like a project such as BJ, which devotes itself entirely to
women's issues.
Salour - I don't like this separation. I think that's
part of the problem. Even in my own field. Nobody helped me.
Working in group exhibitions was always difficult. Even though
galleries were open to me, and opportunities were there, I
advanced because of my strong will. I raised my voice, I made a
big fuss every time, because I had to. If my work was not
arranged properly, I raised hell until it was changed. I would
have been completely ignored if I hadn't. If I had let them
decide, I would have been placed behind every other male
sculptor whose work was less worthy.
But I've gotten tired of fighting. This is why I no longer
participate in group exhibitions. They don't choose people based
on their work. I'm some woman who does this as a hobby. I heard
this all the time.
When I was still with my husband, he used to help me mix the
materials. He was very supportive-it's not like in Europe where
you can just order what you need. You have to mix the stuff
yourself. And I would hear people saying, Maryam doesn't do
anything, it's her husband who does all the work. It was very
difficult to hear. They were even trying to take away my
creativity, my artistic abilities.
This lack of respect that women suffer from in society I see in
my profession all the time. For example, when you look at the
art juries in Iran, out of a jury of five, four are men, and
only one is a woman. When in reality, there is not a shortage of
talented women artists in Iran. There are far more women pottery
makers than men, but the men win all the awards.
The jury is composed mainly of men, and there's still that
attitude that men are the providers, so they should win the
award money. The few women who do win, and are well-known, they
are usually the wives of someone famous or of some hot shot
professor. They're not standing alone. There's usually a famous
brother, husband, or father behind them.
MS
- I hear a lot about this clique mentality among writers and
artists in Iran. Lots of them say that there is a dominant
group, or a few competing groups in each field in which men
dominate.
Salour - Yes, it does exist. And it's absolutely
ridiculous. How can you talk about freedom when you don't
respect it within your field, and you're forming these
exclusionary groups? There are two groups, the leftist
intellectuals and the religious intellectuals, that control the
Museum of Modern Art. I used to show my works there, but I've
had so many bad experiences that I've removed myself from the
scene. I don't fit into either category. I'd rather display my
work in my home and in my yard, and if there comes a day when I
can't do it there, then I'll display them in the streets.
I refuse to limit myself by worrying about being published in
art books and magazines, or being concerned with who the
editor-in-chief is and if he or she likes my work. This is not
why I'm doing art.
MS
- Do you still show your work in galleries?
Salour - Yes, in private galleries. I've shown my work in
Golestan Gallery, and I've spoken to Niavaran Gallery to show my
new works.
When you work for yourself, you're free. We can think, we can
articulate, we can create. A free person doesn't need a
"leader." I remember when President Khatami resigned
from The Ministry of Culture and Guidance. He wrote a letter
that was published in the newspapers, and I saved it. He said it
was because of the lack of freedom in our society. A society
that is not free destroys creativity.
MS
- Do you participate in art guilds?
Salour - I don't. I like freedom so much that I find
these groups stifling. I respect them and wish them success, but
I don't want to limit myself to a specific group.
MS
- I remember during the roundtable discussion BJ held for
the second edition, there was a marked difference between a
younger painter who was active and very enthusiastic about a
newly formed painters' guild, and an older photographer who was
quite skeptical about these organizations.
Salour - The younger generation has the energy and
ability to do things differently. After all, they are children
of the revolution, and I believe that there is potential for
such activities. On the other hand, the older generation has had
a different experience. Some of these groups have operated as
syndicates, and when they have managed to create relationships
with the media and other intermediaries for example, it was only
for members of that syndicate, and not for the art community at
large.
I believe that Iranians don't know freedom and democracy. The
problem is not with the state, it's with the individual. If I
learn how to respect my child, her peers, and my students, and
not impose on them, then I can create a healthy and vital
society. But if I want to project my ideas and wishes on my
child, or on my students, or for my own progress, I attach
myself to my husband or father, or some organization or group,
nothing will change.
MS
- Do you see a difference between men and women in terms of
reactions to your artwork?
Salour - It's mostly women who like my work. I made my
name through my ceramic work. As much as ceramics is art and
decorative, it's also functional. I think that pottery should be
functional. Women use these pieces more, they see the function,
and they generally buy such items.
While there are many men who like my sculptures, women are more
drawn to them. I think it's because I'm a woman, and that
sensitivity informs my work.
MS
- Do you think that your work is feminine?
Salour - Some of my work is. And I think it's an
advantage. A male sculptor cannot convey certain things that a
woman can. However, I wouldn't say that about all my work.
MS
- Do you subscribe to the point of view that Iranians don't
recognize "good art," that the art culture in Iran is
underdeveloped?
Salour - Yes, I think it is, but for a different reason.
There has never been a big gap between fine arts and traditional
art in Iran. A rug that a woman weaves, to me is not any lower
in art form than a painting on a wall. Many of these rug weavers
don't necessarily see their works as art, or themselves as
artists. And very often, you'll see a painting that doesn't
really have much in it. There's not much going on, but in that
rug or in that piece of pottery, you see a great deal of detail,
creativity, and originality.
Miniature paintings, which have a long history and a rich
tradition, were never considered art on its own. They were drawn
for the purpose of being put in books, not on walls. They were
to illustrate and visualize the story for the reader. They were
looked upon with great respect and were an important part of the
book.
At some point, this changed and everything became mixed. We no
longer look at art as a sublime force that finds its expression
through artworks. These things are now looked at as decorative
objects. Miniature painting and calligraphy, which I think are
very honorable and esteemed professions, are used merely as
decorations.
But at some point, this all got confused. Handicrafts became
mixed up with art. My work used to get confused with handicrafts.
Yes, I work with my hands. But I create one unique piece that is
not reproduced, and that captures that moment when I made it. A
thousand copies are not mass-produced where one person creates
the bowl, another paints on it, and another puts the enamel. I
create the object, from start to finish, with my spirit and
feelings that existed in that moment. I don't see a big
difference between my sculptures and my pottery. They are
different medias in which I work.
We are losing our traditional art because of this neglect. The
paintings, ceramics, sculptures that an artist creates because
it's her profession, is a separate issue. The food that
nourishes her, the walk she takes in the streets, the life that
she lives, the thoughts she has, the books she reads-all of
these things are manifested in her work.
But that person who copies her professor's style or
instructions, that's not the same. It's better to sit down and
make the tablecloth that's one hundred percent her.
In Sustan-e Baluchestan for example, they have beautiful pottery
that is made by the indigenous women with the most elementary
materials. They don't have a pottery wheel, they turn it with
their hands, and they use the dirt and mud from their yard for
clay. They use black ink to paint on them. To me, that's pottery.
And they eat their food and drink their water from it. This
tradition, unfortunately, is being eliminated.
MS
- And it's taught within the family, from mother to daughter?
Salour - Yes, in fact, pottery is one of those activities
in which the whole family participates. The man cooks the clay
and the women make it because they are the ones who cook and
serve the food. This is their territory and they know best what
sizes and shapes the pieces should be.
There's one handicraft institute in Tehran that is barely
surviving, with a very small budget. People want their daughters
to know how to paint or photograph, but if she knows how to sew,
that's shameful. Those things are great too, anything that takes
you away from the daily drudgery of life. But it's a shame that
very few people are interested in maintaining our traditional
forms of art.
For the Expo 2000 in Germany, I did some ceramics and
calligraphy and Parvin Etemadi did other forms of Iranian art.
It was an attempt on our part to keep this form of art alive,
make it relevant, and give it the attention it deserves
MS
- Why do you think there is a lack of interest and support
for these old traditional art forms?
Salour - Because they're too traditional and Eastern, and
the other forms are more Western. We're constantly looking to
the West. We think that everything from the West is better.
Us Iranians have very little self-confidence. Look at our
advertisements, for example. On ads for children's food, they
have pictures of little foreign children. It's a tragedy.
And maybe they don't think it's a big deal or even notice, but
subconsciously, it has an effect on all Iranian children. When
that child sees a blue eyed, blond haired child on those
billboards instead of a beautiful dark eyed, curly haired kid
with olive skin, it has an effect. This is the fault of our
intellectuals, professionals, and our graphic artists. I've
heard graphic artists say to me that the people don't understand
and notice the difference anyway. But I tell them that it's
their job to make people understand. It's their responsibility.
Sometimes in my abstract pieces, when I realize that nobody
understands it, I change it and make it a bit more literal.
Maybe it's a mistake, but I want people to be able to relate.
And sometimes, we have to go a little slower so people can catch
up.
MS
- Do you see this as a responsibility?
Salour - No, it's out of love for my art and the pleasure
I take in establishing relations with people. But I don't see it
as a responsibility.
There are other artists who think that the people are not
important. They find a small minority who like their work, and
frankly, I think that even those people don't understand it.
That kind of art doesn't last. It has to move people or nobody
will care in a few years.
MS
- Do you think that it takes a specific type of person to
understand art?
Salour - No, it only depends on how sensitive that person
is. Once, I accidentally stumbled upon a group of blind
children's drawings and I found their teacher who invited me to
an exhibition they were having. I was absolutely amazed. There
was a blind girl, who had drawn a self-portrait, very basic.
This girl was 14 years old, and her drawing was at the level of
an 8 year old, but what amazed me was how accurately she had
drawn herself. The other kids had drawn themselves as well. It
proved to me how much art is about feeling.
When I asked them how they distinguished colors, they said, from
their fingertips. From the roughness and smoothness of the
colors, and from their temperatures. Some colors were warm and
some were cold. And they showed me. One girl who correctly
described all the colors in her paint box, told me that her eyes
were in her fingertips.
When you teach art, so much is about love and establishing
relations. Girls stick it out in my classes longer than the boys
do. And I try to emphasize the importance of sharing. Whatever
you know, share with your classmates, I tell them. You can have
secrets, but to a point.
Back
to top
|